Watch the following commercials from the 80s... When you finish watching, post a comment giving your opinion about the commercials.
What's the difference in the commercials? Which of the commercials would make you buy Energizer? What do you think is the difference between radio and tv ads? Write your comments...
the first comercial is agresive, very "I'll kill you if you don't buy", is funny but the actitude wiht the guy is strange and fear and the other comercial is more peaceful with the competition, the bunnies express fastly, is more atractive than the first comercial. I think that the bunny's comercial get out attention the principal goal.
Well, the first commercial is funny, but I think that also is ridiculous, and realy I won´t buy the product because, I won´t remember the mark!, I´ll just remember the blond man, hahaha. In the second commercial, the advertising is cuter, and I think that is good when a company set a logo, (in the case of energizer is a pink rabbit), because of this way the consumers can identify the product easier.
The first commercial is very funny but is aggresive and crazy, the guy is very strange and the people only see the guy and not the product. I would not buy the product because I forget that and only remember the comical commercial. The second commercial is cute by the bunnies and the logo the product. Both commercial are very funny, I would buy it by the second commercial
The first commercial is funny but strange. It is less aggressive than that seen in classes, but not convinced. The second is more cute but it shows the difference between this battery and others. If I had to choose which convinces me more, I choose the second. I believe that TV commercials can be more effective than radio commercials because the images, actions and situations are more effective than just the voices, sound effects or a dialogue.
The first commercial is funnier and more called the attention of anyone who sees the second is slower, because have you to understand to see the product being sold. I would choose the former because it is most striking, funny the difference are the images, the radio and not see them on TV if you see
The firts commercial is very noisy, because the guy scream a lot and I understand what he said in the message. Instead in te second commercial is quieter and peaceful because we know than the toys represented something of innocent. On the other hand this commercial is more intereting, colorful and teh message is understable.
About the third question i think that the difference is than on TV we can wacht the pictures. Therefor one the radio just we can listen of sound.
I think that the first commercial is very funny but rude and a bit crazy. The man is a "chel" of kanasin ñ_ñ The second commercial is cute, and the message is more convince. I has a pink bunny energizer!!
Differce between this comercials is...the creativity...or well, I think that, because, ok yes,the frist it's noisy but more that noisy, it's boring. The firts comercial don't has imagination, it's verry easy think in one person strong and one batery "strong"...but ok...
And the differens in they comercials of radio and TV, it's verry simple---"THE PICTURRES!!!" xD. In radio you need using sentences shotrs and fast...Ok, it´s all. BYEBYE.XD
The first commercial is very rude, the man have a ugly image and I won´t buy a battery with this commercial but the second is so so because the bunnies are most attractive to the public. It´s a competition about who has more power. I like the bunnies and i think that the public prefers a curious picture of a man shouting.
All reviews say the first commercial is aggressive, but that is the intention because energezer is the "most resistant battery" and the second is more tender, but the idea is the same: that people see the superiority of energizer.
- The first commercial, the actor seeks to convince people to buy the product "energizer" because lasts longer than other battery. He is strong and speak very loudly. The comercial is violent but funny. The second commercial is classic for "energizer" and "duracell", the rabbit is sweet and pink with his drum. The voice is slow. Also seeks convince and sell. :)
I don´t like the first commercial, I think that is funny just the first time but watch it again and again in the tv could be boring. I wouldn´t buy the product because the commercial is aggressive and the product is background. The second commercial is more relax and mere, the product appear more atractive. The bunnies are very curious character and more effective. Maybe I woul buy this product but only if I need it.
The first commercial is very estranger and rare, the man is many many funny and happy, the man sample that he has energy. The commercial is good, nice and cute, because the bonny are nice, and the message is clear. I think that the second commercial buy more that the first commercial, and the different between the commercial radio ads tv ads, the commercial tv ads called more attention, because you can see a picture.
In the first comercial, the principal character (Jacko Jackson) is very strong and energetic but crazy and get out of control. The analogy between the force of the man and the power of the batteries it's reduced by the exaggeration of his gestures, because they results very comical, and nobody it focuses in the batteries because they go to the second level. In the second comercial the bunnys don't results visually so agresive in contrast with Jacko Jackson in the first video, because the second video is more harmonic and balanced, the attention is centred more on the batteries. For that in this case the analogy result more favouring to the objectives of the comercial. Definitively this one is the most convincing
well in my opinion the commercials are very different, not only one is with rabbits and the other with people, also in the message given. the commercial with rabbits is a little cute and original on the other hand the commercial with a bad boy is a little rude an severe. i would buy the commercial rabbits :)
the first comercial is agresive, very "I'll kill you if
ReplyDeleteyou don't buy", is funny but the actitude wiht the guy is
strange and fear and the other comercial is more peaceful
with the competition, the bunnies express fastly, is more
atractive than the first comercial. I think that the
bunny's comercial get out attention the principal goal.
Well, the first commercial is funny, but I think that also is ridiculous, and realy I won´t buy the product because, I won´t remember the mark!, I´ll just remember the blond man, hahaha.
ReplyDeleteIn the second commercial, the advertising is cuter, and I think that is good when a company set a logo, (in the case of energizer is a pink rabbit), because of this way the consumers can identify the product easier.
The first commercial is very funny but is aggresive and crazy, the guy is very strange and the people only see the guy and not the product. I would not buy the product because I forget that and only remember the comical commercial. The second commercial is cute by the bunnies and the logo the product. Both commercial are very funny, I would buy it by the second commercial
ReplyDeleteThe first commercial is funny but strange. It is less aggressive than that seen in classes, but not convinced. The second is more cute but it shows the difference between this battery and others. If I had to choose which convinces me more, I choose the second.
ReplyDeleteI believe that TV commercials can be more effective than radio commercials because the images, actions and situations are more effective than just the voices, sound effects or a dialogue.
The first commercial is funnier and more called the attention of anyone who sees the second is slower, because have you to understand to see the product being sold.
ReplyDeleteI would choose the former because it is most striking, funny
the difference are the images, the radio and not see them on TV if you see
The firts commercial is very noisy, because the guy scream a lot and I understand what he said in the message. Instead in te second commercial is quieter and peaceful because we know than the toys represented something of innocent. On the other hand this commercial is more intereting, colorful and teh message is understable.
ReplyDeleteAbout the third question i think that the difference is than on TV we can wacht the pictures. Therefor one the radio just we can listen of sound.
I think that the first commercial is very funny but rude and a bit crazy. The man is a "chel" of kanasin ñ_ñ
ReplyDeleteThe second commercial is cute, and the message is more convince. I has a pink bunny energizer!!
Differce between this comercials is...the creativity...or well, I think that, because, ok yes,the frist it's noisy but more that noisy, it's boring. The firts comercial don't has imagination, it's verry easy think in one person strong and one batery "strong"...but ok...
ReplyDeleteAnd the differens in they comercials of radio and TV, it's verry simple---"THE PICTURRES!!!" xD. In radio you need using sentences shotrs and fast...Ok, it´s all. BYEBYE.XD
The first commercial is very rude, the man have a ugly image and I won´t buy a battery with this commercial but the second is so so because the bunnies are most attractive to the public. It´s a competition about who has more power. I like the bunnies and i think that the public prefers a curious picture of a man shouting.
ReplyDeleteAll reviews say the first commercial is aggressive, but that is the intention because energezer is the "most resistant battery" and the second is more tender, but the idea is the same: that people see the superiority of energizer.
ReplyDelete- The first commercial, the actor seeks to convince people to buy the product
ReplyDelete"energizer" because lasts longer than other battery. He is strong and speak very loudly. The comercial is violent but funny. The second commercial is classic for "energizer" and "duracell", the rabbit is sweet and pink with his drum. The voice is slow. Also seeks convince and sell. :)
Paola Manzanilla
ReplyDeleteI don´t like the first commercial, I think that is funny just the first time but watch it again and again in the tv could be boring. I wouldn´t buy the product because the commercial is aggressive and the product is background.
The second commercial is more relax and mere, the product appear more atractive. The bunnies are very curious character and more effective. Maybe I woul buy this product but only if I need
it.
The first commercial is very estranger and rare, the man is many many funny and happy, the man sample that he has energy. The commercial is good, nice and cute, because the bonny are nice, and the message is clear.
ReplyDeleteI think that the second commercial buy more that the first commercial, and the different between the commercial radio ads tv ads, the commercial tv ads called more attention, because you can see a picture.
In the first comercial, the principal character (Jacko Jackson) is very strong and
ReplyDeleteenergetic but crazy and get out of control. The analogy between the force of the
man and the power of the batteries it's reduced by the exaggeration of his gestures,
because they results very comical, and nobody it focuses in the batteries because
they go to the second level.
In the second comercial the bunnys don't results visually so agresive in contrast
with Jacko Jackson in the first video, because the second video is more harmonic
and balanced, the attention is centred more on the batteries. For that in this case
the analogy result more favouring to the objectives of the comercial.
Definitively this one is the most convincing
well in my opinion the commercials are very different, not only one is with rabbits and the other with people, also in the message given.
ReplyDeletethe commercial with rabbits is a little cute and original on the other hand the commercial with a bad boy is a little rude an severe. i would buy the commercial rabbits :)