1) If you were a scientist in Antarctica, how would you feel about tourists? Explain.
2) Can you find any weakness in the writer's opinion? Do you agree with everything he says? How much do you agree with him?
Post your comments before Friday!
1) If you were a scientist in Antarctica, how would you feel about tourists? Explain.
2) Can you find any weakness in the writer's opinion? Do you agree with everything he says? How much do you agree with him?
Post your comments before Friday!
candy answers.
ReplyDelete1)If I were a scientist in the Antarctic would be angry with the tourists because it´s very difficult the investigation in that place and I don’t like losing my research because of the tourists
2)I´m agree whit the writer´s opinion, the investigations of the scientists are very important and lost five years of research is very frustrating by the scientists.
1.- if were a scientist,i think that tourists haven´t ecological awareness and that the tousists could represent an impediment in the research,, and because somehow damage the land-scape and the animal that there live.
ReplyDelete2.- i´m agree, because i think that the natural beauty, should be preserverd and the tourism should not be bad to place and the research that realiced are importn not only to this place if not the planet.
1.-If I was a scientist I would feel so bad because I would hurt, maybe, a part of the world that probably could has a lot of information about how we can survive in next years and so I could´t work well with my partners.
ReplyDelete2.- But, I, like tourist could be a bit disagree with the scientist because I imagine that Antartica is one of the most wonderful places of the world to visit.
For this reason I would say that, I don´t Know, the scientists or any other persons should put a specific place for the tourists can visit a little space where they don´t do any damage to a scientific project.
If I were scientist, i wouldn´t like to see tourist in the Antarctic because they destroy the enviroment and important subjects of study. and with respct to the second question I agree with the writer and I think that is sure of what he says
ReplyDelete1) If I was a scientist in Antarctica, I would be very angry with the tourists because i work very hard, in a place with the conditions are not the most comfortable, and these people come to my work place and destroy everything for i work. And the most important reason, because this places have a lot of incredible things that are so difficult to found in another place. And the tourists don´t know about the valuable of these things.
ReplyDelete2)I thing the opinion is great, because the writer is worried about the nature and the careful. But If Antarctica don´t belong to any country, and the scientists be there all days, why the scientists doesn´t protect Antarctica? Why accept the visit of the tourist?
1) Well if I were a scientist working in somewhere like Antartica, and the tourist destroy it, I really feel angry because they are doing bad things and they don't think about the consecuences of they acts, and probably they are destroying the life of there, that grow in a very long time.
ReplyDelete2) Well probably I'm a little disagree because the scientist is saying it a little hard because tourists may not know how to take care that location or how to treat it properly without damaging. Ideally, the same scientists should give the tour to tourists.
Alonso:
ReplyDeleteFirst Answer: I think that if I were a scientist doing investigations in that place, I would be angry no with the tourist, because I am like them, I love to known new places; I would be up set with people who leave them get inside.
Second Answer: I am agree with the writter´s opinion, but in some argumentes I think he could to be more explicit. For example in the case of plants, he said that late a lot of time to grow up again, but mey be he could said what consecuences brings to the Antartica´s enviroment.
What if we see it from the other side? Would you like to be a tourist there? And if you were a tourist... what do you think your behavior would be?
ReplyDelete1.- I think that I feel with fear about the destiny of this part of the world. Because is very fragile and valuable, and I am very concerned also the hole in the ozone layer that makes ice melts. Even I worry about the global warming.
ReplyDelete2.- Well I think that the scientist care about the Antarctic is good, but I think is a very radical. I disagree with this scientist because the reasons that I said before. But I don’t absolutely disagree with this scientist, because I understand his concerned for the Antarctic.
Belem Ceballos.
ReplyDeletea)If I were a scientist in the Antártca I would not agree to the tourism in this place because the presence of people can cause serious problems to the fragile balance of plants and animals around the site.
b)The one weakness I find in reading is when the author said that studies also can cause problems even when the mistakes committed are very small with equipment used. With the other points than the author says of the care for the place I find myself in agreement.